筹码 面 英文

英文摘要

The study conducts a research on the listed stock price historical data of Taiwan under the traditional value stock selection strategy with the bargaining counter of a juristic person and hopes to acquire a better investment portfolio compensation. The data selection uses the period of June, 2006 to September, 2010 as the research period and excludes the financial stock and the individual stock in lack of the data to form the research sample.

Besides considering the basic value stock selection factor, such as P/B and P/E, the study bestows a consideration on the company fundamental, the rate of return of the shareholders’ equity, the yield rate of the stock dividend, the rate of gross profit and the sales growth rate. Finally, the study adds up the bargaining counter factor of a juristic person in expectation of acquiring a relatively low risk and an ample compensation and also verifies whether the traditional value investing strategy is beneficial to raise the investing performance through the adding of the bargaining counter factor of a juristic person.

The findings are as follows:
一、	The value investment portfolio compensation is superior to the overall stock market performance at the same period:
     The value investing concept is to look for the stock with the underestimated price, to buy in and to hold until the stock can profit when the price returns to a reasonable level. The study finds that the investment portfolio established by the finance indicator grading can still have the compensation performance of a higher level than the overall stock market, even undergoing financial crisis.

二、	The compensation of the investment portfolio rises significantly after adding the bargaining counter factor of a juristic person:
The research purpose is to analyze whether the value investing strategy can acquire a higher compensation after adding up the bargaining counter factor of a juristic person; namely, whether the overbought and oversold signal of a juristic person has the positive effect on the value investment portfolio. The finding attests that the investment portfolio compensation is not only superior to the overall stock market compensation but also to the value investment portfolio compensation established by the study after adding up the bargaining counter index of the three main juristic persons.

三、	Weighting the bargaining counter of the foreign capital attests that the overbought and oversold individual stock of the foreign capital can have a better result after intensifying the weight:
    The previous study indicates that the foreign capital and dealer have the market leading effect to some extent. The study raises the weight of the overbought and oversold point of the foreign capital in the investment portfolio and compares whether the investment portfolio weighted by the foreign capital can acquire a higher investment rate of return. The research result finds that the rate of return of the investment portfolio weighted 1.5 times by the foreign capital is the highest among the multiple investment portfolios established in the study.

參考文獻

參考文獻
一、中文文獻
1.	丁小龍，(2005)，貨幣供給與分類股價指數關聯性探討 ，國立高雄第一科技大學金融營運所碩士論文。
2.	王良惠，(2006)，融資、融券及其綜合性指標 與股票報酬關係之研究，國立中正大學財務金融所碩士論文。
3.	王邵佑，(2000)，隨機指標（KD值）投資績效之實證研究，國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
4.	王堯昌，(2008)，「價值投資在亞太市場的實證研究」，國立碩士學程碩士論文。
5.	呂建儀，(2009)，價值型投資法之應用分析 物美價廉的選股策略：以台灣股市為例，國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文
6.	李仁在，(2007)，價量關係技術分析之實證研究-以台指五十成分股為例，淡江大學管理科學研究所企業經營碩士在職專班碩士論文。
7.	周世元，(2007)，基本分析及會計穩健性與投資報酬之關係，輔仁大學會計學系碩士論文。
8.	林珊妏，(2005)，台灣股票市場信用交易之投資策略，國立東華大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。
9.	林美珍、馬麗菁，(2002)，「投資機構交易資訊與市場報酬之互動關係」，證券市場發展季刊，第14卷第3期，,頁43-143。
10.	林琬蓁，(2006)，運用移動平均價與量實證研究－台灣與美國股市比較，國立高雄應用科技大學工業工程與管理系碩士論文。 
11.	邵韻如，(2004)，台灣股市三大法人淨買賣超是否可提供投資人短期獲利機會，國立東華大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。
12.	邱鼎能，(2006)，利用VECM模型探討台灣股票市場與貨幣供給的實證研究，逢甲大學財務金融學所碩士論文。
13.	姜樹宇，(2002)，以本益比法為指標之交易策略在臺灣股票市場之實證研究，國立交通大學資訊管理所碩士論文。 
14.	姚欣欣，(2000)，台灣股市穩定基金之績效評估，國立中央大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。 
15.	洪胤傑，(2002)，台灣股票市場個股與產業動量投資策略之實證研究，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
16.	紀麗文，(2007)，技術分析之實證研究：檢驗K線戰法，國立臺灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
17.	徐慧，(2010)，台積電月營收、股價與經濟因素關連性之研究 ，國立臺灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
18.	張正鵬，(2002)，股價報酬率風險、低振幅比率與技術指標之有效性分析，國立高雄第一科技大學金融營運所碩士論文。 
19.	張金龍，（2006），台股風格投資法之研究與探討，國立中央大學財務金融研究所碩士論文 。
20.	張鈺婉，(2010)，信用交易者是否為具有資訊優勢的投資人，國立中正大學財務金融所碩士論文。 
21.	郭仕淳，(2006)，移動平均價與量雙指標獲利提升之研究－台灣與中國股市分析比較，國立高雄應用科技大學工業工程與管理系碩士論文。 
22.	陳哲明(2007)，外資和投信買賣超與台股指數報酬率之關聯性研究-外資領先？投信領先？，輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。 
23.	彭慧娟(2001)，外資概念股財務報告公告與外資法人買賣超行為之研究，國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
24.	黃嘉斌譯，Benjamin Graham & David L. Dodd著，民國91年，「證券分析」，台北：寰宇出版社。
25.	楊慶豪，(2006)，台灣股票市場投資策略分析之研究-價值投資與成長投資之比較，國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。
26.	葉月女，(2003)，我國證券市場三大機構投資人與一般投資人對股市波動性影響之探討，淡江大學財務金融學系在職專班碩士論文
27.	葉鳳琴，(2003)，三大法人投資行為與加權股價指數互動關係之探討，淡江大學財務金融碩士班碩士論文。
28.	廖世魁，(1996)，國內外法人機構對國內股市影響效果之探討，淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
29.	劉秉龍，(2002)，成長型與價值型投資策略之實證分析－以台灣股票市場為例，靜宜大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
30.	盧彥伯，(1991)，中油公司責任會計制度之研究，國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
31.	錢茂安，(2001)，我國股市相關政策與穩定措施之研究，國立成功大學會計學系碩士論文。
二、英文文獻
1.	Chiao, C. and K. I. Lin, (2004), “The Informative Content of the Net Buy Information of Institutional Investors: Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Market,” Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, Vol. 7, pp.259-288.
2.	Chiyachantana, Chiraphol N. , Pankaj K. Jain, Christine Jiang, and Rober A.Wood, (2004), “International Evidence on Institutional Trading Behavior and Price Impact,” Journal of Finance,  Vol. 59, Issue 2, pp.869-899.
3.	Daniel, Kent, and Sheridan Titman, (1998),  “Characteristics or covariances, “ Journal of Port folio Management , Vol. 24, pp.24-33.
4.	Fama, E. F., and French, K. R., (1992), “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance, June, pp.427-465.
5.	James P. O’Shaughnessy, (1996), What Works on Wall Street: A Guide to the Best-Performing Investment Strategies of All Time, McGraw-Hill, New York.
6.	Kraus, A., and Stoll, H.R., (1972), “Price Impact of Block Trading on the New York Stock Exchange,“ Journal of Finance, Vol. 27, pp.569-588.
7.	Lakonishol, J. A., Shleifer, and R. Vishny, (1994), “Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 49, pp.1541-1578.
8.	Lee, C. M. C., and B. Swaminathan, (2000), “Price Momentum and Trading Volume, “ Journal of Finance, Vol.55, pp.2017-2069.
9.	Ramaswami, M., (1994), Return Enhancement Through Size and Style Management, Blending Quantitative and Traditional Equity Analysis.